HARRY J. TATE, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the district court correctly dismissed the action because it was filed outside the statutory 60-day time limit for seeking judicial review.
Appellant was notified of the denial of his disability insurance benefits on July 19, 1968, and advised of a 60-day period to file a civil action for …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Final Decision Of The Secretary cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Following an administrative proceeding on appellant’s claim for disability insurance benefits, appellant was notified of denial of his claim on July 19, 1968. The notice advised that he might obtain review of the order, pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), by filing a civil action against the Secretary in the district court, within 60 days from the date of notice.
Appellant commenced his action on September 19, 1968, two days late. The district court dismissed. We affirm.
The exclusive method for obtaining judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary is set forth in Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Under that Section:
(g) Any individual, after any final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Secretary may allow. * * * [Emphasis supplied].
The district court was clearly correct in dismissing the action. A petition to review a decision of the Secretary must be brought within the statutory time limit. Jamieson v. Folsom (7 Cir. 1963) 311 F. 2d 506, appeal dismissed and certi-orari denied, 374 U.S. 487, 83 S.Ct. 1868, 10 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1963); Bomer v. Ribi-coff (6 Cir. 1962) 304 F. 2d 427; See, Johnson v. Flemming (10 Cir. 1959) 264 F. 2d 322.
Judgment affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Whipp v. Caspar Weinberger, 505 F.2d 800 (6th Cir. 1974)
-
Ensey v. Elliott Richardson, 469 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- Bomer v. Ribicoff, 304 F.2d 427 (6th Cir. 1962)
- Chamberlin v. Dade Cnty. Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 374 U.S. 487 (U.S. 1963)
- Johnson v. Flemming, 264 F.2d 322 (10th Cir. 1959)
- Jamieson v. Marion B. Folsom now Anthony J. Celebrezze, 311 F.2d 506 (7th Cir. 1963)