RICHARD OLIVER BEECHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
SILVIA LADOVE BEECHAM, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-03-20
No. 83-2287
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.
447 So. 2d 396 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review, which was entered pursuant to our decision in Beecham v. Beecham, 407 So. 2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), is in complete accordance with that opinion and represents an unassailable exercise of the trial court’s discretion in the light of the record as supplemented by evidence taken after remand. Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So. 2d 203 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Meyer Morderer and Irene Morderer v. Smith, 502 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
    …hat the question of the negligence, vel non, of a party in an intersection collision is a close question the same should be regarded as an issue of fact for resolution by the jury. Weber v. Porco, 100 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1958); Thompson v. MacKaravitz, 447 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to Smith and Allstate and remand this cause to the trial court to undertake further proceedings consistent with the foregoing. GUNTHER and STONE,…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw