CITY OF HALLANDALE, APPELLANT,
v.
ACMAR ENGINEERING CORP., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
CITY OF HALLANDALE, APPELLANT,
ACMAR ENGINEERING CORP., ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
447 So. 2d 454
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM. •
Our review of the record satisfies us that the actions of the appellant caused appel-lees to prepare additional sheets and supplements to their plans in an effort to meet appellant’s objections. Such actions amounted to a change in circumstances which necessitated the trial court’s action in entering its interim order which extended the time for compliance with the final judgment granting an injunction. We find that the trial judge acted properly and within his discretion. See, Jackson Grain Co. et al. v. Lee, 150 Fla. 232, 7 So. 2d 143 (1942).
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. AFFIRMED.
HURLEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sec. Mgmt. Corp. v. Markham, 516 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)…1982). (2) Acmar Engineering Corp. v. Farrington, 423 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). (3) City of Hallandale v. Farrington, No. 83-2132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (summarily denied by order of court). (4) City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp., 447 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). (5) City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp., 471 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).…
Authorities Cited
- Jackson Grain Co. v. LEE, 150 Fla. 232 (Fla. 1942)
- MJR Minton, LLC v. Long Doggers Eateries, 251 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)