LAWRENCE E. INGRAM, APPELLANT,
v.
R. J. GAFFNEY, WARDEN, KANSAS STATE PENITENTIARY, LANSING, KANSAS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the district court's judgment, finding the issues presented to be unsubstantial.
Appellant Lawrence Ingram appealed a judgment from the district court. The appellee, the successor warden, filed a motion to affirm.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Affirm cases and more on FLexlaw
[*533] PER CURIAM.
The initial review of this ease prompted us to inform the appellant, Lawrence Ingram, that we were contemplating summary affirmance on our own motion and afforded him an opportunity to submit a memorandum addressing the underlying merits. See Rule 8(d), Revised Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (1970). Additionally, the appellee has filed a motion to affirm with supporting suggestions.
Pursuant to Rule 43(c), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, R. J. Gaffney, Warden, the successor to Warden Sherman H. Crouse, has been substituted as the proper appellee.
We have now carefully reviewed the files and record in this case and are thoroughly convinced that the judgment of the district court is correct. Concluding that there is no need for further argument on the unsubstantial questions presented, the motion to affirm is granted for the reasons stated by the district court in 322 F.Supp. 1328 (D.C.Kan. 1970). See No. 260-70, Gafford v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, etc., et al., 434 F. 2d 318 (10th Cir., November 16, 1970).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Denny Lee Gafford v. Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan., & State of Alaska, 434 F.2d 318 (10th Cir. 1970)