RONALD G. WRIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Coerced Guilty Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
MILLS, Judge.
Wright contends the trial court erred in denying his Rule 3.850 motion without an evidentiary hearing. His motion alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, failure of the trial court to establish a factual basis for his guilty plea, and his plea of guilty was coerced. We affirm.
The record furnished us clearly shows that before the trial court accepted Wright’s plea of guilty, pursuant to plea bargaining, it determined from Wright, while he was under oath, that he was satisfied with the services of his attorney, that a factual basis for the plea was established, and that his plea was not coerced.
In addition, the allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel do not follow the guidelines laid down in Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997 (Fla.1981).
AFFIRMED.
WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Ramsey, 475 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 1985)…2d 1263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). 367 So. 2d at 702. We approve the Akers decision. This rationale eliminates some difficult questions concerning when transportation begins. As stated by Judge Orfinger in his special concurrence in State v. Iafornaro, 447 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984): Since a suspect does not become a “prisoner” until he is placed under arrest, and since he cannot be transported to a place of confinement until he becomes a prisoner, unless the facts clearly show that the officer had no inten…
-
Johnson v. State, 536 So. 2d 1045 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…pellant did not escape from a physically restricted facility like a hospital or jail, his freedom of movement was nonetheless restricted. In Ramsey, the Supreme Court quoted, with approval, Judge Orfinger’s special concurrence in State v. Iafornaro, 447 So. 2d 961, 962-3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), where it was stated: Even though not yet physically restrained, one who has been placed under arrest has had his liberty restrained in that he is not free to leave. His confinement has thus begun and if he escapes from l…
-
Hebert v. State, 962 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…ing an arrest, reasoning that “ ‘transportation to a place of confinement’ begins at the time the suspect is placed under arrest.’ ” State v. Ramsey, 475 So. 2d 671, 672 (Fla.1985) (quoting Judge Orfinger’s special concurrence in State v. Iafornaro, 447 So. 2d 961, 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)); see also Kyser v. State, 533 So. 2d 285, 287 (Fla.1988) (“For there to be an escape, there must first be a valid arrest.”). There can be no escape from a mere detention. See Pollen v. State, 834 So. 2d 380, 382 (Fla. 3d DC…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 1981)