CHARLES A. PORTER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
CHARLES A. PORTER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
439 F.2d 264
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is taken from an order of the District Court denying the petition of a Florida state prisoner for the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.
In this habeas corpus case the United States District Court denied relief on the ground that Porter had failed to exhaust state remedies. A study of the record reveals that this, indeed, is true. Porter’s allegations with reference to the denial of a direct appeal have never been considered by a state appellate court, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254; Wheeler v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1969, 407 F. 2d 816; Harrison v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1970, 424 F. 2d 633.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hargrett v. Louie L. Wainwright, 474 F.2d 987 (5th Cir. 1973)
-
Johnson v. Louie L. Wainwright, 448 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1971)
-
Brookins v. State, 461 F.2d 663 (5th Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Wheeler v. Beto, 407 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Hess Shipping Corp. v. The SS Charles Lykes, 424 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1970)