HARVARD J. HART AND SHIRLEY MARIE HART, APPELLANTS,

v.

SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY AND WICKES CORPORATION, D/B/A WICKES LUMBER COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Fertally v. Miami-Dade Cmty. Coll., 651 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …without cause. See Narkier v. Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 636 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Brothers v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 474 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Career Serv. Comm’n, 448 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Florida Dep’t of Envtl. Regulation v. Florida Career Serv. Comm’n, 344 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). We would, of course, have a different case if Miami-Dade had discharged appellant pri- or to the expiration of her annual c…
• O'Donnell's Corp. v. Himrod Ambroise, 858 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …., concurs, and concurs specially with opinion. ORFINGER, J., dissents with opinion. . We considered the possibility of treating this appeal as a petition for writ of prohibition. See, e.g., Dept. of Health and Rehab. Servs. v. Career Serv. Com’n, 448 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (holding that district courts have power to issue writs of prohibition to administrative agencies to prevent them from exceeding their jurisdiction). However, prior opinions uniformly hold that the untimely filing of a request fo…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Arce v. Maher Guiley & Maher, P.A., 936 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …a non-final, non-appeal-able order, their petition was untimely. A certiorari petition must be filed within thirty days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)(1); Dep’t Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Career Serv. Comm’n, 448 So. 2d 18, 19 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). A motion for rehearing directed to a non-final order does not suspend the jurisdictional time for seeking review of the order by certiorari because rehearing is not authorized as to non-final orders. E.g., Coldwell Banker Co…

Authorities Cited

• Chorak v. Naughton, 409 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)