DAVID ALLAN WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1984-03-16
No. 83-1764
OTT, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.
448 So. 2d 20 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sullivan v. State, 303 So. 2d 632 (Fla.1974); Carter v. State, 435 So. 2d 900 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

OTT, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. State, 484 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1986)
    …EHRLICH, Justice. The district court has certified that its decision in this case, Smith v. State, 448 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), is in direct conflict with a decision of another district, Winkle v. State, 422 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Smith was convicted of a second-degree misdemeanor, trespass in…
  • Connor v. State, 944 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …. 5th DCA 2004). For example, when sentencing a defendant for violation of probation the trial court may: impose a fine that could have been, but was not, imposed at the time the defendant was sentenced on the substantive charge, see Smith v. State, 448 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); order payment of fees that could have been, but were not, ordered at the time defendant was sentenced on the substantive charge, see Woods; assess a drug multiplier to the scoresheet that was not applied at the time of the origi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw