PETER ARIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
BIG TEN TAXI CORPORATION, EMPLOYERS SERVICE CORPORATION AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
PETER ARIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
BIG TEN TAXI CORPORATION, EMPLOYERS SERVICE CORPORATION AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
441 F.2d 536
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Peter Aris has appealed from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for review of an order of the Florida Supreme Court denying certiorari. The district court correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., 1257(3); Iacaponi v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, W.D.Pa.1966, 258 F.Supp. 880, 884, affirmed 379 F. 2d 311, cert. denied 1968, 389 U.S. 1054, 88 S.Ct. 802, 19 L.Ed.2d 849. The order appealed from is due to be and is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gresham Park Cmty. Org. v. Howell, 652 F.2d 1227 (5th Cir. 1981)
-
Lampkin-Asam v. The Supreme Court OF Fla., 601 F.2d 760 (5th Cir. 1979)
-
Dasher v. The Supreme Court OF Tex., 650 F.2d 711 (5th Cir. 1981)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Hackworth v. United States, 389 U.S. 1054 (U.S. 1968)
- Dino Iacaponi v. NEW Amsterdam Cas. Co., 379 F.2d 311 (3d Cir. 1967)