ALFRED HERBERT CUNNINGHAM, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALFRED HERBERT CUNNINGHAM, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
448 So. 2d 68
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court’s written order revoking the defendant’s probation does not conform to its oral pronouncement finding that the defendant had not violated conditions 6 and 9, and upon remand, these findings should be stricken from the written order. In all other respects, the order revoking probation is affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gator Freightways, Inc. v. Roberts, 550 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 1989)…se in which the district court held that Gator Freightways was the statutory employer of an employee of its independent contractor, who did not carry workers’ compensation coverage. We find conflict with Williams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 448 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), and Florida Power and Light Co. v. Brown, 274 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). We have jurisdiction, article V, § 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and approve the district court decision in the instant case. The relevant facts indic…1 / 2
-
Roberts v. Gator Freightways, Inc., 538 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…tractor” within the meaning of Section 440.10. Gator also relies on National Union Fire Insurance Company v. Underwood, 502 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), in which the court followed the Brown case and Williams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 448 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). In the latter case, Pan American World Airways was held not to be a “contractor” under section 440.10 because its “ ‘primary obligation’ in transporting their luggage arises not out of its countless individual contracts, that is,…1 / 2
-
Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Underwood, 502 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)…ot, FP & L’s primary obligation, as a public utility, is to provide electric power to its customers as provided by statute. Florida Power & Light Co. v. Brown, 274 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). See also Williams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 448 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). National also contends that the attorney’s fee award was excessive and not based upon substantial evidence. We find no merit in that argument. There was conflicting evidence adduced, some of which would have supported an even la…