METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF, LAURENCE C. JONES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE,
v.
LAURENCE C. JONES, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, LAURENCE C. JONES, III, DEFENDANT

5th Cir. | 1971-04-09
No. 30607
442 F.2d 1043 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to transfer the action.


Facts & Procedural History

An interpleader action was filed in Mississippi concerning insurance funds. The appellee resided in Mississippi, the contract originated there, and wi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

This appeal arises out of a contest of funds interpleaded in the district court by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. The district court awarded the funds to Dr. Laurence C. Jones, Sr., the appellee, and his son, Laurence C. Jones, Jr., appellant, asserts error on the judgment adverse to him.

The sole thrust of this appeal is whether the district court abused its discretion in refusing to grant the motion of appellant to transfer the action from the Southern District of Mississippi to the Southern District of New York. The interpleader action was filed in the Southern District of Mississippi by Metropolitan. The appellee, Dr. Jones, Sr., was 85 years of age and resided in Mississippi. The contract of insurance was taken out in Mississippi, delivered in Mississippi, and all the premiums on the policy were paid in Mississippi. A substantial number of the witnesses were residents of Mississippi, and the law of Mississippi applies to all questions that might arise out of the action.

We find no abuse of discretion by the district court in denying the motion of appellant to transfer under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). See Nowell v. Dick, 5 Cir., 1969, 413 F. 2d 1204; Pilot Life Insurance Company v. Boone, 5 Cir., 1956, 236 F. 2d 457.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw