EDWIN C. BOUTTE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-CROSS APPELLEES,
v.
CHEVRON OIL COMPANY, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS APPELLANT, V. STATE MINERAL BOARD, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
EDWIN C. BOUTTE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-CROSS APPELLEES,
CHEVRON OIL COMPANY, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE-CROSS APPELLANT, V. STATE MINERAL BOARD, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
442 F.2d 1337
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
This matter had the careful attention of the district court as is reflected in the findings of fact and conclusions of law of that court. See Boutte v. Chevron Oil Company, E.D.La., 1970, 316 F.Supp. 524.
It is apparent from a study of the record and the briefs of the parties that the district court did not commit error in any particular as charged in the appeal or cross-appeal. The judgment appealed from will therefore be affirmed with costs to be cast on appellants to the extent of 75 per cent and on Chevron to the extent of 25 per cent.
Affirmed on the appeal and cross-appeal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts, 472 U.S. 797 (U.S. 1985)
-
Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman, 486 U.S. 717 (U.S. 1988)
-
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Adams, 513 F.2d 355 (5th Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence