MORTON GLOBUS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
LAW RESEARCH SERVICE, INC. AND ELLIAS C. HOPPENFELD, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; BLAIR & CO., GRANBERY, MARACHE, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF, V. PAUL WIENER, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT

2d Cir. | 1971-06-14
Nos. 861, Docket 35645
442 F.2d 1346 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the district court's award of contribution to Blair & Co. against its co-defendants, Law Research Service, Inc. and Ellias C. Hoppenfeld.


Facts & Procedural History

Blair, LRS, and Hoppenfeld were found jointly and severally liable for securities violations. Blair satisfied the judgment and sought contribution fro…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

We affirmed in open court Judge Marvin E. Frankel’s award to Blair & Co., Granbery, Marache, Inc. (Blair) of contribution in the amount of one-third each from Law Research Service, Inc. (LRS) and Ellias C. Hoppenfeld (Hop-penfeld), Blair’s co-defendants in an earlier stage of these proceedings.

In Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc., 418 F. 2d 1276 (1969), we affirmed a judgment entered against Blair, LRS, and Hoppenfeld for their joint and several liability pursuant to § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a) and § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S. C. 78j(b) for failing to disclose material facts in connection with a public offering of the stock of LRS. 287 F.Supp. 188 (D.C.1968). Blair subsequently satisfied the judgment and by a motion in the district court sought to compel LRS and Hoppenfeld to pay their pro-rata shares of the judgment.

Judge Frankel awarded contribution. We agree with both his result and reasoning and affirm the judgment on the basis of his opinion, reported at 318 F. Supp. 955 (1970).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (16 total)

Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw