MARY BOWES, PETITIONER,
v.
DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
MARY BOWES, PETITIONER,
DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
443 F.2d 30
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The final order for deportation is affirmed.
Mary Bowes is a teacher and an alien. She overstayed the length of her non-immigrant permission. She does not want to go home.
At issue here is Immigration’s refusal to delay proceedings because she had a petition pending at the Department of Labor for a sixth preference for admission as an immigrant. This, she says, deprived her of due process. The pendency of an application for immigration status, however, does not entitle an alien to a delay in deportation proceedings. See Manantan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 7 Cir., 425 F. 2d 693, and Amarante v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 326 F. 2d 58.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodolphe Noel v. Chapman, 508 F.2d 1023 (2d Cir. 1975)
-
Jovita Rubio de Cachu v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 568 F.2d 625 (9th Cir. 1977)
-
Armstrong v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 445 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1971)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Amarante v. Rosenberg, 326 F.2d 58 (9th Cir. 1964)
- Manantan v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 425 F.2d 693 (7th Cir. 1970)