YANCY DOUGLAS HARDY, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE ET AL., APPELLEES
YANCY DOUGLAS HARDY, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE ET AL., APPELLEES
443 F.2d 402
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellant, under sentences of imprisonment for violations of state and federal law, wants credit on his federal sentence for the time he served in state prison. He bases his contention on the fact that the sentence by the state court was made to run concurrently with the sentence he was then serving.
It is fundamental that appellant’s federal sentence did not begin to run until appellant, a parole violator, was returned to federal prison for the service of the balance of his sentence.1 Zerbst v. Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359, 58 S.Ct. 872, 82 L.Ed. 1399 (1938); Clark v. Blackwell, 374 F. 2d 952 (5th Cir. 1967); Hash v. Henderson, 385 F. 2d 475 (8th Cir. 1967). The cases cited by appellant do not support his contention.'
Judgment affirmed.
. 18 U.S.C. § 3568.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Graham, 538 F.2d 261 (9th Cir. 1976)
-
Meagher v. Clark, 943 F.2d 1277 (11th Cir. 1991)
-
Dobine v. United States Attorney General, 456 F.2d 1256 (5th Cir. 1972)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Zerbst v. Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1938)
- Hash v. Henderson, 385 F.2d 475 (8th Cir. 1967)
- Clark v. Olin G. Blackwell, 374 F.2d 952 (5th Cir. 1967)