UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
JOHN D. BURTON, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the defendant's solicitation notices, despite containing disclosures, were sufficient evidence to support a jury's finding of mail fraud because they were calculated to mislead.
The defendant was convicted of mail fraud based on his publication of a national directory and the manner in which he solicited participants. His soli…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse 18 U.S.C. § 1341 Construction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Appeal is taken from a mail fraud conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The government's case was based upon the striking similarity between the defendant’s “solicitation” for advertising and an ordinary invoice from the telephone company billing for space in its classified directory. The defendant did publish a national directory. Fault may be found only in the manner in which he attracted participants. The testimony of these unwary contributors to the defendant’s finances was that after only a cursory examination they believed that they were paying for the telephone directory advertising, and that they would not have knowingly subscribed to the defendant’s directory.
We note that the solicitation mailed by the appellant was not identical to a bill for a “yellow pages” listing and that it disclosed on its face that it was merely a solicitation. But we conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support a jury’s finding that the appellant’s notices were calculated to mislead the unwary and that their mailing was punishable as mail fraud. Linden v. United States, 4 Cir., 254 F. 2d 560.
Earlier he had suspended a similar enterprise based in Florida after warnings by a postal inspector. He moved to California, however, and resumed the business there. It was from California that he caused the mailings upon which this indictment is based.
Affirmed.