LARRY JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1984-04-12
No. 82-1443
DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.
448 So. 2d 577 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
COWART, Judge.

COWART, Judge.

We hold that a motion made by appointed defense counsel for a continuance in order to prepare for trial is effective to waive a prior pro se demand for speedy trial filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(a)(2). The defense of a criminal charge is a serious, highly technical undertaking and some one person must be in charge of tactics and strategy and ready for trial. A demand for a speedy trial is not made in good faith and is not valid if the defense is not ready for trial. Defense counsel cannot be ready and not ready for trial at the same time. When a defendant charged with crime has an attorney it is the responsibility of the attorney to know when the defense is ready or not ready for trial. See Judge Cobb’s consideration of this problem in Dickey v. Honorable Raymond T. McNeal, 445 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dep't OF Child. & Families v. Monroe, 744 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
    …s. v. Cordoves, 650 So. 2d 1117, 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Employer’s Overload of Dade County v. Robinson, 642 So. 2d 72, 73 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Clay Hyder Trucking v. Lastinger, 586 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Kolmel Plumbing, Inc. v. Kolmel, 448 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); City of Tampa v. Fein, 438 So. 2d 442, 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Sunny Pines Convalescent Ctr. v. Walters, 422 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The order reserved jurisdiction to set the amount of fees and contemplated further pr…
  • Emp'r's Overload OF Dade Cnty. & Ga. Cas. v. Robinson, 642 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
    …an order adjudicating the merits of a claim for benefits, reserve jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees, without affeeting the finality of the order adjudicating the merits (which may include an award of costs). See Kolmel Plumbing, Inc. v. Kolmel, 448 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); City of Tampa v. Fein, 438 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The appeal is dismissed without prejudice to raise the question of costs on appeal of a final order disposing of all matters then pending before the judge of compensat…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw