JENNIFER MORRIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1984-04-13
No. 83-2253
OTT, C.J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
448 So. 2d 598 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1984)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that attorney's fees and clerk's costs cannot be assessed against an insolvent defendant without prior notice and an opportunity to be heard.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant was convicted of delivery of cannabis and ordered to pay attorney's fees and clerk's costs. She argued these assessments were improper d…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SCHEB, Judge.

SCHEB, Judge.

Jennifer Morris appeals from her judgment and sentence for delivery of cannabis.

In addition to placing defendant on probation for two years, the trial court also entered.a final judgment assessing an attorney's fee of $250 and clerk’s costs of $50 against defendant. Because she is insolvent, defendant argues that the attorney’s fee and clerk’s costs should not have been assessed against her. Attorney’s fees and costs may be assessed against a defendant adjudged insolvent after notice and hearing under section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1981). Anderson v. State, 415 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Here, nothing in the record indicates that defendant was given notice and an opportunity to object to the assessment of attorney’s fees and costs. Drumm v. State, 432 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

Accordingly, the assessment was not appropriate and is hereby stricken. Our decision is without prejudice to the state to assess these fees and costs in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 27.-56.

We see no merit in defendant’s other contention; therefore, in all other respects, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

OTT, C.J., and HOBSON, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw