WILLIAM M. HODSDON, ALSO KNOWN AS WILLIAM MERRILL HODSDON
v.
W. LAIRD STABLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AND RUTH M. FERRELL, A DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, APPELLANTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Federal courts cannot grant declaratory or injunctive relief when a state criminal action is pending against the party seeking such relief.
Appellee sought a declaratory judgment that a Delaware flag desecration statute was unconstitutional and an injunction against a pending state crimina…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Younger V. Harris Abstention Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
On May 11, 1970, the declaratory judgment of the District Court in this appeal, holding the relevant portion of the Delaware Flag Desecration Statute (11 Del.C. § 532) unconstitutional on its face, was rendered in favor of appellee. The latter was then and still is the defendant in a pending State of Delaware criminal action based upon a violation of that Statute. The District Court denied appellee’s request for an injunction against the defendants.
On February 23, 1971, the United States Supreme Court decided a number of cases which effectively present the role of the Federal Courts with respect to intervention by injunction or declaratory relief in a criminal matter then pending in a State court. Those decisions are Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669; Samuels v. Mackell, 401 U.S. 66, 91 S.Ct. 764, 27 L.Ed.2d 688; Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S.Ct. 674, 27 L.Ed.2d 701; Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 200, 91 S.Ct. 769, 27 L.Ed.2d 781 and Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U.S. 216, 91 S.Ct. 777, 27 L.Ed.2d 792. Under these decisions, particularly Younger and Samuels, appellee is not entitled to either injunction or declaratory judgment while the Delaware criminal action against him is pending in the courts of that State.
The judgment of the District Court will be reversed. The case is remanded to said Court which is directed to dismiss the complaint herein. Costs will be taxed against appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Smith v. Goguen, 415 U.S. 566 (U.S. 1974)
-
Monroe v. State Court OF Fulton Cnty., 739 F.2d 568 (11th Cir. 1984)
-
Oldroyd v. Kugler, 461 F.2d 535 (3d Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (U.S. 1971)
- Samuels v. MacKell, 401 U.S. 66 (U.S. 1971)
- Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1971)
- Dyson v. Stein, 401 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1971)
- Byrne v. Karalexis, 401 U.S. 216 (U.S. 1971)