GARY PATRICK MASTRO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reversed a conviction for vehicular homicide because vehicular homicide is not a proper lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter. The inclusion of vehicular homicide on the verdict form constituted reversible error requiring a new trial.
Vehicular homicide is not a Category 1 lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter because it requires proof of causation (an element of reckless behavior causing death) that DWI manslaughter does not require. It is also not a Category 2 lesser included offense because the charging document did not allege the element of recklessness required for vehicular homicide. The erroneous inclusion constitutes reversible error.
[1] Vehicular homicide is not a Category 1 lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter because it requires proof of causation, an element not necessarily required for DWI man…
[2] The Florida Standard Jury Instructions' designation of offenses as lesser included is not binding on the courts.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“All of the elements of a Category 1 lesser included offense must be elements of the greater offense.”
Establishes the controlling legal standard for determining whether a lesser included offense qualifies as a Category 1 offense.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMastro was charged with DWI manslaughter under Florida Statute 316.1931(2). At trial, Mastro objected to the inclusion of vehicular homicide as a less…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Dwi Manslaughter cases and more on FLexlaw
LEHAN, Judge.
The issue in this case is whether vehicular homicide is a lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter.
We find that vehicular homicide is not a Category 1 lesser included offense notwithstanding its designation as such in the Florida Standard Jury Instructions. The list of lesser included offenses in that publication is not binding. See Linehan v. State, 442 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Bragg v. State, 433 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). We also find that under the facts of this case vehicular homicide was not a Category 2 lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter. The defendant was charged with DWI manslaughter, a violation of section 316.-1931(2), Florida Statutes (Supp.1982). Defendant objected to the inclusion of vehicular homicide as a lesser included offense on the proposed verdict form and proposed jury instructions.
The trial court denied the objection.
The jury found defendant guilty of vehicular homicide, and defendant appeals.
All of the elements of a Category 1 lesser included offense must be elements of the greater offense. See White v. State, 412 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Vehicular homicide, a violation of section 782.071, Florida Statutes (1981), requires proof that defendant’s reckless behavior caused the death for which he is charged. See, e.g., J.A.C. v. State, 374 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
However, conviction for DWI manslaughter apparently does not require proof that defendant’s negligent behavior caused the death. See Baker v. State, 377 So. 2d 17 (Fla.1979).
Thus vehicular homicide requires proof of an element of causation that the greater offense of DWI manslaughter does not require.
Accordingly, vehicular homicide is not a Category 1 lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter. Vehicular homicide could be a Category 2 lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter if the charging document contained allegations of all the elements required for vehicular homicide. See Baker v. State, 425 So. 2d 36, 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (Cowart, J., dissenting).
However, we do not find that the language in the information which charged defendant with DWI manslaughter contained allegations of the element of recklessness required for vehicular homicide.
It has been suggested that the inclusion of vehicular homicide as a lesser included offense on the verdict form in this case was harmless error because the defendant was on notice, by virtue of the list of lesser included offenses in the standard jury instructions, that vehicular homicide might be submitted to the jury as a lesser included offense.
We disagree. A jury should be given the right to exercise its pardon power by receiving instructions on the proper lesser included offenses. See State v. Bruns, 429 So. 2d 307 (Fla.1983).
The jury in this case chose not to convict defendant of the crime charged, but to convict him of what the jury was instructed was the most serious of the lesser included crimes. It may be that if vehicular homicide had not been included on the list of lesser included offenses, the jury might have convicted defendant of one of the remaining lesser included offenses, which would have been less severe than vehicular homicide. We therefore cánnot say that defendant was not harmed by the improper inclusion of vehicular homicide as a lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter. REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR NEW TRIAL.
OTT, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Higdon v. State, 465 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)…t vehicular homicide cannot be a necessarily lesser included offense (Category 1) of D.W.I. manslaughter. Two district courts of appeal in Florida agree with this conclusion. See Houser v. State, 456 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Mastro v. State, 448 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). “Nevertheless, the Florida Supreme Court, in its schedule of lesser included offenses, has specifically included vehicular homicide as a necessarily lesser included [*1311] offense of D.W.I. manslaughter, and promulgated that sc…1 / 3
-
Spillane v. State, 458 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…appellant and find no reversible error demonstrated. However, we recognize that our holding that vehicular homicide is a lesser included offense of DWI manslaughter conflicts with a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Mastro v. State, 448 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). AFFIRMED. DOWNEY, LETTS and HURLEY, JJ., concur.…
-
Lodson v. State, 478 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…nial of that motion. We find no merit to Lodson’s challenge. We write, however, to comment on his contention that he is entitled to postconviction relief. Lodson correctly points out that, after he was sentenced, this court held in Mastro v. State, 448 So. 2d 626 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), that vehicular homicide is not a lesser included offense of D.W.I. manslaughter. But see Spillane v. State, 458 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); cf. Higdon v. State, 465 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Although appellant correct…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Bruns, 429 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 1983)
- Linehan v. State, 442 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
- Baker v. State, 425 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Baker v. State, 377 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1979)
- Douglas Slavin, M.D. v. Univ. OF Miami, Inc., 374 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Cleveland O. Bragg v. State, 433 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
- White v. State, 412 So. 2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)