IRMA J. SMITH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLEE,
v.
CONCORDIA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the District Court's findings regarding racial discrimination in teacher dismissals and its establishment of faculty racial ratios were not clearly erroneous and did not constitute an abuse of discretion.
The Board attacked a District Court judgment that placed sixth graders in Vidalia Junior High School and found the Board had engaged in racially discr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse "Clearly Erroneous" Standard Of Review cases and more on FLexlaw
BY THE COURT:
The Board’s attack on the District Court’s judgment placing the sixth grade in Vidalia Junior High School is without merit.
The District Court’s findings, that the Board had neither developed nor applied objective criteria in connection with the reduction of staff positions, and that the dismissal of black teachers was racially discriminatory, are not clearly erroneous. See Singleton et al. v. Jackson Municipal Separate School System, 5 Cir. 1969, 419 F. 2d 1211. Nor did the District Court abuse its dis cretion in establishing faculty racial ratios that would govern personnel changes until the school board formulated objective and reasonable non-discriminatory criteria governing dismissals, demotions, hiring and promotions. See United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education, 1969, 395 U.S. 225, 89 S.Ct. 1670, 23 L.Ed.2d 263.
The Board having made no objection or suggestion to the District Court that it desired to tender evidence, we will not entertain, for the first time on appeal, an argument that the court’s failure to consider evidence was error. As of May 1, 1971, there were 5240 students in the system: 2355, or 44.-94%, were white; and 2885, or 55.1%, were black. The faculty numbered 297: 141, or 47.47%, were white; and 156, or 52.53%, were black. These ratios substantially comply with Singleton, swpra. The District Court will require the Board, the plaintiffs, and the Department of Justice to submit, within 15 days, non-discriminatory, non-racial objective criteria to cover both faculty reduction and dismissals for cause. If the parties cannot agree on such criteria, the District Court will, within thirty days thereafter, require the Board to adopt the criteria that the District Court prescribes so as to effectively comply with the provisions of Singleton, supra. Once proper criteria have been established the merit qualifications of Carter v. West Feliciana Parish School Board, 5 Cir. 1970, 432 F. 2d 875, will be applicable. See Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 1971, 402 U.S. 1, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554.
The District Court shall require the school board to file during the school year a semi-annual report similar to those required in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir. 1970, 433 F. 2d 611, 618-619.
Affirmed and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bettye Joe Baker v. Columbus Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., 462 F.2d 1112 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
Armstead v. Starkville Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., 461 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
Pitts v. Freeman, 887 F.2d 1438 (11th Cir. 1989)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1971)
- Singleton v. Jackson Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., 419 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1969)
- United States v. Montgomery Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 395 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1969)
- United States v. Hinds Cnty. Sch. Bd., 433 F.2d 611 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Carter v. W. Feliciana Parish Sch. Bd., 432 F.2d 875 (5th Cir. 1970)