GROVER CLEVELAND MCDANIEL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
SHERIFF OF DALLAS COUNTY AND STATE OF TEXAS, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES

5th Cir. | 1971-06-24
No. 30829
445 F.2d 851 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971) Caution
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a habeas corpus petition is not moot even if the sentence has been served, and the petitioner is entitled to adjudication on the merits if state remedies are exhausted.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner, a former prisoner, filed a habeas corpus petition while his direct appeal was pending. The district court denied relief for failure to exh…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Grover Cleveland McDaniel, a former prisoner of the State of Texas, appeals from the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. We vacate and remand.

At the time the petition was filed below, the appellant’s direct appeal was pending in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. For this reason the district court denied relief for failure to exhaust state remedies in compliance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254, but granted a certificate of probable cause to appeal, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253; Fed.R. App.P. 22(b).

During the time that McDaniel’s appeal was pending here, the Texas court affirmed his conviction upon the direct appeal. McDaniel v. State, Tex.Cr.App. 1970, 461 S.W. 2d 603. Shortly thereafter he was released from confinement upon expiration of his three-year sentence.

The appellant now has no remedy under the law of Texas, for state habeas corpus is unavailable once a petitioner is neither in custody nor restrained of his liberty. Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Code Crim.P. 11.07, 11.23; Ex parte Ruby, Tex.Cr.App.1966, 403 S.W. 2d 129. Having exhausted his state remedies, appellant McDaniel should be given his day in federal court on the merits of his habeas contentions. He was still serving his state sentence at the time he filed that petition, so he is entitled to have it adjudicated on its merits. The case is not moot even though the sentence has been served. Carafas v. La Vallee, 1968, 391 U.S. 234, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 20 L.Ed.2d 554. Therefore, we vacate the order appealed from and remand the case to the district court for adjudication of the merits of McDaniel’s habeas corpus petition.

Vacated and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw