WILLIAM ELLHAMER, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE,
v.
LAWRENCE E. WILSON, APPELLANT; CHARLES HINNINGTON, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, V. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS
WILLIAM ELLHAMER, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE,
LAWRENCE E. WILSON, APPELLANT; CHARLES HINNINGTON, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, V. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS
445 F.2d 856
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The orders granting writs of habeas corpus to Ellhamer and Hinnington, California state prisoners, are reversed. The district court will enter orders denying the writs.
We are asked to overrule our cases which have upheld California in not providing counsel on parole revocation hearings. This we decline to do. See High Pine v. Montana, 9 Cir., 439 F. 2d 1093; Lincoln v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 435 F. 2d 133; Mead v. California Adult Authority, 9 Cir., 415 F. 2d 767.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cooper v. Fitzharris, 586 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir. 1978)
-
Dorado v. Kerr, 454 F.2d 892 (9th Cir. 1972)
-
Dennis v. Cal. Adult Auth., 456 F.2d 1240 (9th Cir. 1972)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mead v. Cal. Adult Auth., 415 F.2d 767 (9th Cir. 1969)
- Abe Lincoln v. The Cal. Adult Auth., 435 F.2d 133 (9th Cir. 1970)
- Pine v. The State OF Mont. & W. J. Estelle, Jr., 439 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1971)