JACK MARTIN PETERSON, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
W. J. ESTELLE, WARDEN OF THE MONTANA STATE PENITENTIARY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a conflict of interest existed between jointly represented codefendants, denying one effective counsel.
Peterson and Evans were jointly tried for burglary with a single attorney. A prosecution witness attributed an exculpatory statement from Evans that i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conflict Of Interest cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The district court granted Peterson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Estelle, the warden of the Montana State Penitentiary, appeals.
Peterson and Evans were jointly tried in the Montana court for burglary. A single counsel was appointed to represent both. There was no direct evidence connecting Peterson to the burglary. However, a prosecution witness attributed to Evans an exculpatory statement that inculpated Peterson. Neither Peterson nor Eyans took the stand. The district court found that the statement created a conflict of interests between counsel’s duties to each of the codefend-ants, and issued the writ.
Whether a conflict of interests existed is a question of fact. The district court’s finding was not clearly erroneous, and it therefore must stand. Moss v. Craven, 9 Cir., 1970, 427 F. 2d 139, 140; Knowles v. Gladden, 9 Cir., 1967, 378 F. 2d 761, 766-767. The district court properly applied the law in concluding that the conflict of interests denied Peterson the right to effective representation of counsel. See Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 75-76, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60 (U.S. 1942)
- Commodore William Moss v. Craven, 427 F.2d 139 (9th Cir. 1970)
- Knowles v. Gladden, 378 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1967)