JOHN RIDENOUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
JOHN RIDENOUR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
446 F.2d 57
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The order denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is affirmed. Petitioner’s attack on the legality of his sentence under the Youth Corrections Act was decided adversely to him in Ridenour v. United States, 438 F. 2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1971). His remaining contentions concerning the manner of the execution of his sentence are not cognizable under § 2255, which is available only to test the sentence imposed, not a sentence as it is being executed. Mordecai v. United States, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 421 F. 2d 1133, 1139-1140 (1969); Freeman v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 15, 254 F. 2d 352, 353-354 (1969).
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Andrino v. United States Bd. OF Parole, 550 F.2d 519 (9th Cir. 1977)
-
Cohen v. United States, 593 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1979)
-
Brown v. United States, 610 F.2d 672 (9th Cir. 1980)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Linton K. Mordecai, Jr. v. United States, 421 F.2d 1133 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
- Freeman v. United States, 254 F.2d 352 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
- Ridenour v. United States, 438 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1971)