ELIZABETH MILLS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
L. K. SMALL, M.D., DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1971-08-03
No. 71-1511
446 F.2d 249 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the plaintiff's civil rights action was barred by the statute of limitations and that the defendant was immune from liability due to his quasi-judicial role.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff sued a medical examiner for allegedly certifying examination without performing it. The action was filed in October 1970, concerning an even…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her in propria persona action charging the defendant with certifying to the Superior Court of Ala-meda County on July 21, 1954, that he had examined the plaintiff when he had not. The defendant, Dr. Small, was at the time a medical examiner for the Superior Court and acting within the scope of his employment. Plaintiff sought general and exemplary damages.

The district court dismissed upon the grounds that the action was barred by the statute of limitations and that the appellee was immune from liability for the act charged. We affirm.

Although the complaint, filed in October 1970, does not state its basis for federal jurisdiction, we assume it charges a violation of her civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. That statute contains no limitation period but resort may be had to the California law. A liability “created by statute” must be brought within three years. Cal.Code Civ.P. § 338(1). As such her action is barred. Donovan v. Reinbold, 433 F. 2d 738 (9th Cir. 1970); Smith v. Cremins, 308 F. 2d 187 (9th Cir. 1962).

In addition, Dr. Small was acting in a quasi-judicial capacity and was immune from liability for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Burkes v. Callion, 433 F. 2d 318 (9th Cir. 1970).

The judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw