WILLIAM F. WYANT, APPELLANT,

v.

SAM BATTISTA, JR., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Travelers Commercial Ins. Co. v. Harrington, 154 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. 2014)
  …e those expectations. [Likewise, t]he insurer correctly expects [the insured] to be bound in all respects which are of benefit to it. More precisely, both are entitled to all they bargained and paid for.” (quoting Indus. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Acquesta, 448 So. 2d 1122, 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984))). In addition, automobile insurers have never provided individualized UM coverage; instead, UM coverage premiums are calculated based on the coverage selected for the policy as whole. Yet, the First District’s interpretat…
• Acquesta v. Indus. Fire & Cas. Co., 467 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 1985)
  …OVERTON, Justice. This is a petition to review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported as Industrial Fire & Casualty Co. v. Acquesta, 448 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), in which the district court held that the Acquestas were precluded from recovering uninsured motorist benefits because the wife, in applying for automobile insurance at the direction of her husband, rejected uninsured motorist c…
• Don's SOD Co., Inc. v. Dep't of Revenue, 661 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …vrolet Co., Inc., 547 So. 2d 325, 326 n. 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); In re E.B.L., 544 So. 2d 333, 336 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Clara P. Diamond, Inc. v. Tam-Bay Realty, Inc., 462 So. 2d 1168, 1169 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Industrial Fire and Casualty v. Acquesta, 448 So. 2d 1122, 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), approved, 467 So. 2d 284 (Fla.1985); Chapman v. Pinellas County, 423 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Holmes v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc., 369 So. 2d 987, 988 (Fla. 4th DCA [*899] 1979); State v. Hayes, 333 So. 2d 51 (…

Authorities Cited

• Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
• Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
• Clayton v. Ruthe Lee Clayton, 442 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)