UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE,
v.
JOSEPH ANTHONY DAVIS, APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE,
JOSEPH ANTHONY DAVIS, APPELLANT
447 F.2d 1376
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.
Davis contends that the implication of Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295, 90 S.Ct. 506, 24 L.Ed.2d 532, and other cases require a finding here that induction was accelerated because of his delinquency. On the record, we think not.
United States v. Davis (9th Cir. 1970), 432 F. 2d 1009; Misenhimer v. United States (9th Cir. July 22, 1971) 71-1384; and United States v. Pennington (9th Cir. 1971), 439 F. 2d 145, require affirmance. We find United States v. Dobie, 444 F. 2d 417 (4th Cir., 1971) distinguishable.
The mandate will issue now.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Davis v. United States, 417 U.S. 333 (U.S. 1974)
-
United States v. FOX, 454 F.2d 593 (9th Cir. 1971)
-
United States v. Travers, 514 F.2d 1171 (2d Cir. 1974)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gutknecht v. United States, 396 U.S. 295 (U.S. 1970)
- United States v. Dobie, 444 F.2d 417 (4th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Pennington, 439 F.2d 145 (9th Cir. 1971)
- Kelly v. Eclipse Motor Line, 432 F.2d 1009 (4th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Davis, 432 F.2d 1009 (9th Cir. 1970)