UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
JAMES WESLEY FRIEND, APPELLANT; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, V. NEDRA JEAN FRIEND, APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1971-09-13
Nos. 71-1714, 71-1715
448 F.2d 742 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the search of the vehicle was lawful due to probable cause and impracticability of obtaining a warrant, and the statutory challenge was meritless.


Facts & Procedural History

Defendants were convicted of unlawful possession of a sawed-off shotgun found in their car trunk during an arrest. They argued the search was illegal …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

James Wesley Friend and Nedra Jean Friend were convicted of violating 26 U.S.C. § 5861(c) — unlawful possession of a firearm (a “sawed-off” shotgun) made in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5822

and violating 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) — unlawful possession of a firearm (the said shotgun) not registered to them in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record.

They urge two grounds for reversal of the judgments.

1. The search and seizure

FBI agents seized the gun from the locked trunk of the Friends’ automobile when they arrested Friend on a charge of unlawful flight to avoid prosecution. Friend was seated at the wheel of the vehicle (Mrs. Nedra Friend and one Rene Bud Wyman were passengers). He was preparing to drive away from a parking place.

Appellants argue that the search was illegal, because the officers had no search warrant, and because it was not undertaken to secure “the fruits of or the implements used to commit” the crime which precipitated the arrest. Appellants further assert that the search cannot be upheld as incident to a lawful arrest, since the trunk was not “within the immediate control” of any of the occupants of the car. Neither argument need be considered. The evidence relating to the search warranted the factual conclusion, not only that the officers had probable cause to believe that the ear contained contraband which was being illegally transported, but also that it was impracticable for them to secure a warrant. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925).

2. The constitutionality of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(c) and (d)

Appellants’ self-incrimination challenge to the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act is wholly without merit. United States v. Freed, 401 U.S. 601, 91 S.Ct. 1112, 28 L.Ed.2d 356 (1971); United States v. Jones, 446 F. 2d 12 (9th Cir. 1971).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw