RAYMOND I. BRANTLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
RAYMOND I. BRANTLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
448 F.2d 770
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 46 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellant filed a habeas petition in the district court seeking immediate reinstatement of his mandatory release from a five-year federal sentence. He alleged that he had never been informed whether his mandatory release had been revoked although nearly five months had elapsed since his revocation hearing before the parole board.1
Appellant’s full sentence expired on June 1, 1971, on which date he was released from federal custody. Thus the appeal is rendered moot and is therefore dismissed.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time ■ fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F. 2d 981.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (23 total)
-
Cisneros v. Corpus Christi Indep. Sch. Dist., 467 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
United States v. Tex. Educ. Agency, 467 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
Ross v. Houston Indep. Sch. Dist., 699 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 23 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kimbrough v. Beto, 412 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1969)