NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
A. W. THOMPSON, INC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that there was substantial evidence to support the National Labor Relations Board's findings that the employer engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to bargain in good faith and by unilaterally implementing a wage increase, thus enforcing the Board's order.
The National Labor Relations Board petitioned for enforcement of its order against A. W. Thompson, Inc., finding the company violated the National Lab…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Decertification Election cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied.
. The Board ordered Thompson to (1) bargain in good faith with Local 826, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, the sole bargaining representative of approximately 154 employees of Thompson, in the bargaining unit in question duly certified by the Board after election on August 10, 1966; (2) to post notices to employees to the effect that the Company will not interfere with the rights of the employees to select their own bargaining representative and to bargain with said representative; (3) to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices found by the Board and from interfering with, restraining or coercing its employees in the exercise of their Section 7 rights, 29 U.S.C. § 157; and (4) to notify the Regional Director what steps have been taken.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (22 total)
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kaiser Agric. Chems., 473 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1973)
-
Allied Indus. Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 476 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
-
Peoples GAS Sys., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 629 F.2d 35 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
Previewing 3 of 22 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (26 total)
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1969)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 (U.S. 1962)
- Franks Bros. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 321 U.S. 702 (U.S. 1944)
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 321 U.S. 678 (U.S. 1944)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed & Prince MFG. Co., 205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Herman Sausage Co., Inc., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Birmingham Publ'g Co., 262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1958)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co., 111 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1940)
- Serio v. United States, 346 U.S. 887 (U.S. 1953)