FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONER-CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT-CROSS-PETITIONER; EL PASO DISTRICT JOINT BOARD, AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, PETITIONER, V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT
FARAH MANUFACTURING COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONER-CROSS-RESPONDENT,
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT-CROSS-PETITIONER; EL PASO DISTRICT JOINT BOARD, AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, PETITIONER, V. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT
450 F.2d 942
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s conclusion that the company violated Sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act by interrogating and then discharging an employee, and by promulgating and maintaining plant rules prohibiting solicitation, distribution and access to other areas, Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), and it appears that the Board did not improperly apply the standards set forth in N. L. R. B. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105, 76 S.Ct. 679, 100 L.Ed. 975 (1956), in determining that the company did not violate Section 8(a) (1) of the Act by denying non-employee organizees access to its premises.
Enforced.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Farah Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. & Amalgamated Clothing Workers of Am., El Paso Dist. Joint Bd., AFL-CIO, 481 F.2d 1143 (8th Cir. 1973)
-
Hutzler Bros. Co. v. The Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 630 F.2d 1012 (4th Cir. 1980)
Authorities Cited
- Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1951)
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105 (U.S. 1956)