D.S., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-05-08
No. 82-2577
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUB-BART and NESBITT, JJ.
449 So. 2d 415 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The adjudication of delinquency below is supported by one of the respondent’s confessions in evidence which — unlike Harper v. State, 411 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), upon which she relies — is thoroughly inconsistent with both her exculpatory testimony at trial and her other extra judicial statements. State v. Frazier, 407 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw