UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
CLIFFORD W. W. FOREMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1971-12-13
No. 71-2259
452 F.2d 336 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a letter declaring an intention not to register does not fulfill the legal requirement to present oneself for registration.


Facts & Procedural History

Foreman was convicted of failing to perform a duty imposed by the Selective Service Act by refusing to register. He sent a letter to his local board d…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Foreman appeals from the judgment convicting him of failing to perform a duty imposed upon him by the Selective Service Act. None of his assignments has merit.

The government’s evidence provided ample support for the jury’s implied finding that Foreman deliberately refused “to present himself for and submit to registration,” that being the crime charged against him. (50 U.S.C. App. §§ 453, 462).

His letter to his local board— in which he declared his intention not to register — did not oblige the board to effect his registration, for he did not meet the precondition of 32 CFR §§ 1613.-11 and 1613.13 that he “present himself for and submit to” registration. Neither the Act nor the Regulation make any provision-for a “constructive” registration. Likewise, Foreman cannot urge that the board failed to comply with 32 CFR § 1613.16; the operation of that regulation is likewise limited to those instances where a candidate has presented himself to his local board. United States v. Bigman, 429 F. 2d 13 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied 400 U.S. 910, 91 S.Ct. 141, 27 L.Ed.2d 150.

Judgment affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw