FRANKLIN DELANO LINDSAY, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• The Prudential Ins. Co. OF Am., Inc. v. Baitinger, 452 So. 2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …nal until it has been affirmed by the appellate court. We find, however, that Joyner is not controlling in the instant case. Our primary concern in the realm of statutory interpretation is to vindicate the legislative intent. Moldofsky v. Stregack, 449 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). In doing so, we must look at each separate and distinct legislative enactment independently. Therefore, the supreme court’s interpretation of “final judgment of conviction” for purposes of the habitual criminal statute in Joyner…
• Stregack v. Moldofsky, 474 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1985)
  …McDonald, justice. We have for review Moldofsky v. Stregack, 449 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), which directly and expressly conflicts with Coleman v. Estate of Coleman, 439 So. 2d 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The issue here is whether a surviving spouse may challenge an ant…
• Est. OF H. Ransley Sage v. Sage, 515 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …rs subsequent to statute’s enactment), it is not the [*1327] first. The third district has consistently held that, in probate proceedings, the law in effect at the date of the decedent’s death is the correct law to be applied. Moldofsky v. Stregack, 449 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), reversed on other grounds, 474 So. 2d 206 (Fla.1985); Flagship National Bank of Miami v. King, 418 So. 2d 275, 277 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Estate of Garcia v. Garcia, 399 So. 2d 486, 489, (Fla. 3d DCA), petition for review denied, 40…

Authorities Cited

• Summerson v. State, 200 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)