ROBERTO GUTIERREZ-RUBIO, PETITIONER,
v.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT

5th Cir. | 1972-01-13
No. 71-1831
453 F.2d 1243 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972) Negative Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A state's probation statute that relieves a convicted person of penalties and disabilities does not vitiate a conviction for federal deportation purposes.


Facts & Procedural History

An alien was convicted of violating a Texas firearms statute, which is a ground for deportation. After conviction, the alien received relief under a T…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Gutierrez-Rubio, an alien, was convicted of violating the Texas firearms statute by having in his possession a weapon which could be fired both automatically and semi-automatically. Such a conviction is a ground for deportation.1 Deportation proceedings were begun but before completion, appellant was granted relief under the Texas Adult Probation and Parole Law2 which serves to relieve a probationer of the penalties and disabilities resulting from his conviction. The Special Inquiry Office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service ordered that the deportation proceedings be terminated on the ground that the Texas statute effectively expunged the conviction upon which the deportation charge was based. A majority of the Board of Immigration Appeals reversed the order of the immigration officer, and held that the finality of the conviction had not been vitiated for deportation purposes. This appeal is from the Board’s decision. We affirm.

This appeal raises the identical issue presented to this court in Gonzalez de Lara v. United States.3 In de Lara we rejected the contention that the Texas statute so erased or expunged a conviction for unlawful possession of marijuana that it was eliminated as a ground for deportation. Rubio suggests that de Lara should be limited to narcotics violations. Although there is some authority for such a result,4 we based our decision in de Lara upon principles of federalism which are in no way bounded by the nature of the offense involved.

The manner in which Texas chooses to deal with a party subsequent to his conviction is simply not of controlling importance insofar as a deportation proceeding — a function of federal, not state, law — is concerned.5

Gutierrez-Rubio’s conviction for a violation of the Texas firearms statute was a valid ground for the deportation order notwithstanding the Texas statute.

Affirmed.

. 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251(a) (14). In pertinent part the statute provides for the deportation of any alien in the United States who:

“at any time after entry, shall have been convicted of possessing or carrying in violation of any law any weapon which shoots or is designed to shoot automatically or semi-automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger, or a weapon commonly called a sawed-off shotgun

. Vernon's Ann.Texas Code Crim.Proced. Ann. art. 42.12 § 7 (1966).

. 439 F. 2d 1316 (5th Cir. 1971).

. See Garcia-Gonzales v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 344 F. 2d 804, 808-810 (9th Cir. 1965). But see de la Cruz-Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 404 F. 2d 1198, 1200 (9th Cir. 1968), cert, denied, 394 U.S. 955, 89 S.Ct. 1291, 22 F.Ed.2d 491 (1969).

. 439 F. 2d at 1318.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw