DONALD CHRISTIAN DAVIS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1971-12-27
No. 71-2060
453 F.2d 1366 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F. 2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970). Appellant Davis’ 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 motion to vacate contained the following contentions: (1) his plea of guilty was void because it was coerced (2) his plea of guilty was void because it was tainted by incriminating statements that were illegally and unconstitutionally obtained and would be illegally inadmissible in court against him (3) the search of his automobile was illegal (4) his plea of guilty is void because it came after a failure to provide him with counsel at the time of his illegal confession and (5) his plea of guilty was not voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently made. After a full and thorough evidentiary hearing at which Davis was represented by appointed counsel, the district court rendered detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court found against Davis on all his contentions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw