UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
ALAN KLAES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
ALAN KLAES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
453 F.2d 1375
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972)
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Klaes’ sole contention is that only hearsay evidence was presented to the grand jury, and therefore the indictment should have been dismissed. This contention is without merit. See Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 76 S.Ct. 406, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956); United States v. Gower, 447 F. 2d 187 (5th Cir. 1971). The judgment is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Mead Data Cent., Inc. v. United States Dep't of the Air Force, 566 F.2d 242 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
-
Emle Indus., Inc. v. Patentex, Inc., 478 F.2d 562 (2d Cir. 1973)
-
United States v. Cruz, 478 F.2d 408 (5th Cir. 1973)
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1956)
- United States v. Gower, 447 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1971)