VIRGIL HAYWARD, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1972-01-18
No. 71-2732
454 F.2d 733 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that defects in criminal informations not objected to before trial do not invalidate convictions and cannot be raised post-verdict.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought habeas corpus relief from convictions for uttering forged checks and escape, claiming the criminal informations were not properly ve…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

By petition for writ of habeas corpus, Virgil Hayward is seeking relief from three convictions for uttering forged checks and one for escape. Represented by counsel, he pled guilty to these charges in the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida. Although there was no direct appeal, petitioner has adequately exhausted his state post-conviction remedies, as is required by the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Petitioner’s sole contention is that his convictions are invalid because the criminal informations were not properly verified by the state’s attorney. In support of this contention, Haywood relies on a Florida case which was reversed on appeal. The Florida Supreme Court has now held that formal defects in an information not objected to prior to trial do not affect the validity of the conviction, and cannot be complained of after verdict. State v. Polo, 242 So. 2d 457 (Fla.1970).

We agree with the district court that this appeal involves a matter of state law which does not amount to violation of any federally protected right of the appellant. See United States ex rel. Budd v. Maroney, 398 F. 2d 806 (3d Cir. 1968); Selgado v. Baker, 394 F. 2d 831 (10th Cir. 1968); Johnson v. Beto, 383 F. 2d 197 (5th Cir. 1967), cert, den., 393 U.S. 868, 89 S.Ct. 153, 21 L.Ed.2d 136 (1968). The denial of the petition is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw