GREGORY EDWARD MILLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Crimes Compensation Trust Fund cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Through an Anders1 brief, Gregory Edward Miller appeals a final order revoking his probation, adjudicating him guilty of one count of burglary and one count of grand theft, and sentencing him to two five year concurrent terms. After reviewing the brief and the record on appeal, we find no error in the order revoking probation.
In the judgment, appellant was ordered to pay $10 pursuant to section 960.20, Florida Statutes (1981) (Crimes Compensation Trust Fund), and $2 pursuant to section 943.25(4), Florida Statutes (1981) (Law Enforcement Training and Correctional Officer Training Trust Fund). Appellant, an insolvent, was not given adequate notice of the assessment of these costs nor the full opportunity to object to the assessment. The assessment was not appropriate and is hereby stricken. Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984); Kerney v. State, 445 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Our decision is without prejudice to the state to tax these costs in accordance with the procedure outlined in Jenkins.
In all other respects, the judgment and sentences are affirmed.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ludwig v. Ladner, 637 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…ies are not bound by expert opinions, it is possible that an occasional jury could logically make such a decision. See Shaw v. Puleo, 159 So. 2d 641 (Fla.1964); Burton v. Powell, 547 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Slacter v. City of St. Petersburg, 449 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 458 So. 2d 271 (Fla.1984).…
-
Cnty. OF Sarasota v. Selva L. Burdette, 479 So. 2d 763 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…operly award damages in an amount less than that suggested by expert testimony, it must still be guided by the greater weight of the evidence, and it is not free to totally ignore the only evidence presented to it. Slacter v. City of St. Petersburg, 449 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA), pet. for rev. denied, 458 So. 2d 271 (1984); see also Behm. The county also contends that the trial court erred in granting a motion for new trial on the issue of business damages in connection with parcel 2. We agree. Appellee Pizz…
-
State v. Mid-Florida Growers, Inc., 541 So. 2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…oidable expense in their analysis is subject to dispute. That dispute, however, goes to the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the plaintiffs’ expert. It was a matter properly resolved by the jury. Behm; Slacter v. City of St. Petersburg, 449 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 458 So. 2d 271 (Fla.1984). VI. COMPENSATION FOR LOST PRODUCTION The nurseries owners’ claim for lost or retarded production of new stock can be analyzed by two separate methods. The claim for lost production arises ou…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla. 1984)
- Kerney v. State, 445 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- City OF Vero Beach v. Larry Catron Invs., Inc., 445 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)