MITSUBISHI INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ET AL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
12,000 TONS STEEL CARGO ABOARD M/V ST. NICHOLAS, THE M/V ST. NICHOLAS, HER MASTER AND THOSE IN INTEREST WITH HER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES CO, LTD, ET AL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, V. 538 AUTOMOBILES AND 5,200 TONS OF STEEL CARGO, ABOARD M/V GOLDEN ORCHID, THE M/V GOLDEN ORCHID, HER MASTER AND THOSE IN INTEREST WITH HER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. ASSOCIATE METAL AND MINERAL CORPORATION ET AL, PLAINTIFFSAPPELLEES, V. 2,000 TONS STEEL CARGO ABOARD M/V ILKIN TAK, THE M/V ILKIN TAK, HER MASTER AND THOSE IN INTEREST WITH HER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. TOYOMENTA, INC, ET AL, PLAINTIFFSAPPELLEES, V. 4,500 TONS APPROXIMATELY OF STEEL CARGO ABOARD M/V EASTERN GLORY, THE M/V EASTERN GLORY, HER MASTER AND THOSE IN INTEREST WITH HER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. AMERICAN RADIO ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, ET AL, INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS
MITSUBISHI INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ET AL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
12,000 TONS STEEL CARGO ABOARD M/V ST. NICHOLAS, THE M/V ST. NICHOLAS, HER MASTER AND THOSE IN INTEREST WITH HER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES CO, LTD, ET AL, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, V. 538 AUTOMOBILES AND 5,200 TONS OF STEEL CARGO, ABOARD M/V GOLDEN ORCHID, THE M/V GOLDEN ORCHID, HER MASTER AND THOSE IN INTEREST WITH HER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. ASSOCIATE METAL AND MINERAL CORPORATION ET AL, PLAINTIFFSAPPELLEES, V. 2,000 TONS STEEL CARGO ABOARD M/V ILKIN TAK, THE M/V ILKIN TAK, HER MASTER AND THOSE IN INTEREST WITH HER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. TOYOMENTA, INC, ET AL, PLAINTIFFSAPPELLEES, V. 4,500 TONS APPROXIMATELY OF STEEL CARGO ABOARD M/V EASTERN GLORY, THE M/V EASTERN GLORY, HER MASTER AND THOSE IN INTEREST WITH HER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. AMERICAN RADIO ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, ET AL, INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS
454 F.2d 1170
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Assuming arguendo the existence at one point of a case or controversy within the meaning of Article III of the Con-“titution, it is now undisputed that the ■aiders which gave rise to the issue underlying this appeal are moot. The judgment of the district court in question is therefore vacated and the cause is remanded with direction to dismiss the proceedings as being moot. Cf. Troy State University v. Dickey, 5 Cir, 1968, 402 F. 2d 515, 516-517; and Lebus for and on Behalf of N.L.R.B. v. Seafarer’s Int’l Union, 5 Cir, 1968, 398 F. 2d 281, 283, on the procedure to be followed by the Court of Appeals in dismissing a case by reason of mootness.
Vacated and remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cole v. Hall, 462 F.2d 777 (2d Cir. 1972)
-
Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 466 F.2d 1267 (9th Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- Troy State Univ. & Bd. of Trs. v. Dickey, 402 F.2d 515 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Lebus v. Seafarers' Int'l Union of N. Am., 398 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1968)