THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
R.A., A JUVENILE, APPELLEE
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
R.A., A JUVENILE, APPELLEE
450 So. 2d 229
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of State v. C.C., 449 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (en banc), we dismiss the State’s appeal from an order of dismissal and suppression and decline to treat the proceeding as a petition for certiorari. We certify direct conflict with State v. J.P.W., 433 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) and State v. W.A.M., 412 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 419 So. 2d 1201 (Fla.1982) and that this decision passes upon the following question of great public importance:
Does the State have the authority to file appeals in juvenile cases, and, if not, may this court review by certiorari either an order dismissing a count of a petition for delinquency or one suppressing evidence in such a case?
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Noreen Foley Djokic and Jeanette Teufel v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 875 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…in favor of one against whom penalty would be imposed). It is also estab: lished that section (l)(d)l. is directed only to escrow funds and does not apply to the failure to deliver contested commission fees. See Golub v. Dep’t of Prof'l Regulation, 450 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Fleischman v. Dep’t of Prof'l Regulation, 441 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), (stat ute governing discipline of real estate licensees is confined to unjustified refusals of a licensee to account for or return property received i…
-
Ramsey v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 574 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…st Ramsey for these commissions to establish the fact that the necessary funds to pay the commissions came into the hands or control of Ramsey. To support its position, the Department cites the case of Golub v. Department of Professional Regulation, 450 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). The Department relies on the language in Golub which states: [o]nce there is a judicial determination that a broker is not entitled to retain non-escrowed property then this statute is authority to discipline the broker for fai…
Authorities Cited
- State v. C.C., 449 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Floyd v. Fla. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 412 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- State v. W. A. M., 412 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- State v. J.P.W., 433 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)