UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
DAVID GREENE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a conviction for failure to report for induction is complete on the date of failure to report, and subsequent conditions are irrelevant.
Appellant was convicted for failure to report for induction into the Armed Forces. He argued the trial court should have allowed re-examination based …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Circumstances Beyond Control cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Greene appeals from his conviction for failure to report for induction into the Armed Forces. 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We affirm.
Appellant argues that the trial court should have given him an opportunity to submit to re-examination at the induction center based upon a possible disqualifying condition discovered after he had failed to report. His crime, however, was complete on May 27, 1970, the day that he failed to report. Any subsequent action or condition was irrelevant to his present conviction. United States v. Maybury, 453 F. 2d 1233 (9th Cir. 1972); United States v. Shunk, 438 F. 2d 1204 (9th Cir. 1971).
Greene also contends that his local board erred in not considering several letters it received after his order to report for induction had been mailed. Since this issue is raised for the first time on appeal, we need not consider it. United States v. Currier, 453 F. 2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1972). However, we observe that the letters presented neither a prima facie case for reclassification nor circumstances beyond Greene’s control. Hence, the board was.not obligated to consider them. Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Jarratt, 471 F.2d 226 (9th Cir. 1972)
-
United States v. Borkenhagen, 468 F.2d 43 (7th Cir. 1972)
-
United States v. Bingham, 484 F.2d 365 (9th Cir. 1973)
Authorities Cited
- Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1971)
- United States v. Shunk, 438 F.2d 1204 (9th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Currier, 453 F.2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1972)
- United States v. Maybury, 453 F.2d 1233 (9th Cir. 1972)