JOHN BONHAM AND GERALD COUCOULAS, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The defendants’ failure to object at trial to the admission of certain evidence which they had unsuccessfully moved to suppress before trial waives their right to claim on appeal that the evidence was erroneously admitted. Fraterrigo v. State, 151 Fla. 634, 10 So. 2d 361 (1942); Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534 (1927); Rodriguez v. State, 433 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), and cases collected therein; Jones v. State, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We find no merit in, and certainly no support for, the defendants’ contention that an exception to this well-settled rule exists where the pretrial motion to suppress is heard and decided immediately before the commencement of trial.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (18 total)
-
Thomas v. State, 599 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…ndant’s failure to make a timely objection at trial though the court noted that the defendant’s pre-trial motion in limine was denied “immediately prior to trial.” German v. State, 379 So. 2d at 1013. (Emphasis added). Similarly, in Bonham v. State, 450 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1984), the Third DCA held that the defendant waived his right to appellate review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, where he unsuccessfully moved to suppress evidence before trial but [*167] did not raise an object…
-
Snow v. Nelson, 475 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1985)…is before us on a certification by the district court of appeal that the case passes upon a question of great public importance and warrants a reexamination of the principles announced in Gissen v. Goodwill, 80 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1955). Snow v. Nelson, 450 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(5), Fla. Const. The case involves the question of parental responsibility for injuries inflicted by a minor child. The facts are fully set forth in the opinion below. For our purposes, it is…
-
Cordero v. State, 589 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…unsel below not only failed to object but specifically stated that she had no objection to the admission of the contraband. McKelton v. State, 528 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Baglio v. State, 467 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Bonham v. State, 450 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Gilling v. State, 443 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We do agree with appellant, however, that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal as to the trafficking in cocaine charge. To establish const…
Previewing 3 of 18 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770 (Fla. 1927)
- Fraterrigo v. State, 151 Fla. 634 (Fla. 1942)
- Blowers v. Williams, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
- Jones v. State, 360 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Isidro Rodriguez v. State, 433 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)