ARTHUR PRIEST AND PARKER PRIEST, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conspiracy To Traffic In Cannabis cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellants, Arthur and Parker Priest, challenge the trial judge’s denial on the basis of King v. State, 104 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1957), of their respective motions to dismiss that count of the information charging them with conspiracy to traffic in cannabis. We affirm. See State v. Brandon, 399 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); State v. Cristodero, 426 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). Appellant Parker Priest also argues that the trial judge’s imposition of a fine as a condition of parole violates Section 947.-13(1)(b), Florida Statutes, as interpreted in Ferrell v. State, 437 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), and Alexander v. State, 425 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). The alleged error was not preserved below. Accordingly, we decline to reach the merits of the issue raised and dismiss without prejudice to appellants’ right to collaterally attack the sentence pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
BOOTH, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S. Bakeries & Kemper Grp. v. Corwin Cooper, 659 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…s. The cases addressing whether a change in the law should be viewed as substantive or procedural have routinely treated the entitlement to a service, and the source of payment therefor, as a matter of substance. See Clay Hyder Trucking v. Atherton, 450 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Webb v. Hills Van Service, 414 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Ship Shape v. Taylor, 397 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Section 440.13(5) is likewise properly viewed as effecting a substantive change in the law, insofar as it…
-
ACE Disposal & Fla. Air Condition Contractors v. Holley, 668 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…tantive and should not be applied retroactively.). Similarly, if an amendment “substantially changes” the liability of the E/C from what it was when the injury occurred, it may not be applied retroactively. See Clay Hyder Trucking Lines v. Atherton, 450 So. 2d 318, 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (Because amendment concerning who has responsibility to assume the cost of rehabilitation increases potential liability of E/C, it is substantive in nature and applies prospectively only.); Ship Shape v. Taylor, 397 So. 2d 1…
-
Wiggins v. State, 460 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…such persons may not legally be convicted of a conspiracy, (emphasis supplied) 104 So. 2d 730, 733 (Fla. 1958). See also State v. Brandon, 399 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); State v. Cristodero, 426 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Priest v. State, 450 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); State v. Bass, 451 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). In the instant case, the substantive offense charged was trafficking in cannabis by delivery. Delivery is defined as the actual, constructive, or attempted transfer from one per…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- King v. State, 104 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1957)
- State v. Cristodero, 426 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
- Samuel S.J. Alexander v. State, 425 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
- State v. Brandon, 399 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
- Ferrell v. State, 437 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)