PETER BRIAN CIKORA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PETER BRIAN CIKORA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
450 So. 2d 351
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction because no reversible error was made to appear. As to the order revoking probation, four violations were claimed. We record that the first alleged violation, attempted burglary of the home of Florence Jarboe, was unsupported by record evidence and, thus, was not proven. However, the three remaining alleged violations were proven and furnish adequate support for the revocation.
Affirmed.
GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Albritton v. State, 458 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…h are disapproved on appeal. However, many cases affirm without remand a revocation of probation based on any valid violation charge although on appeal other violation charges are found not to be supported in law or fact. See, e.g., Cikora v. State, 450 So. 2d 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). This court has previously affirmed without remand where a departure sentence is based on insufficient reasons as well as sufficient ones, see Higgs v. State, 455 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). Cf., Young v. State, 455 So. 2d 55…
-
Cikora v. Dugger, 840 F.2d 893 (11th Cir. 1988)…ent matter. The state moved to exclude Do-norvitch, and the trial court granted the motion. Cikora was convicted and sentenced to concurrent prison terms of fifteen years and five years. The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction, 450 So. 2d 351. Cikora then filed his petition for habeas corpus in federal district court. The Magistrate recommended that the writ issue on the ground that the photographic lineup was impermissibly suggestive. The district judge concluded, however, that Ci-kora’…
-
Cikora v. Wainwright, 661 F. Supp. 813 (S.D. Fla. 1987)