THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
VIRGIL D. HAWKINS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court approved the referee's findings and recommended discipline, imposing a public reprimand and a ten-day suspension.
[1] A referee's report in an attorney disciplinary proceeding is deemed accepted when neither party seeks review.
[2] Conduct involving misrepresentation can violate Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis is an attorney disciplinary proceeding based on a complaint from The Florida Bar and a report from a referee. The referee found the respondent at…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Costs Of Proceedings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This attorney disciplinary proceeding is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and report of the referee. Neither party has sought review of the referee’s report. The referee’s report and record were filed with this Court pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.06(9)(b) of the Integration Rule of the Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The referee recommended that respondent be found guilty of violating Discipli nary Rule 1-102(A)(4) of the Code of Professional Responsibility for conduct involving misrepresentation; Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(6) for other conduct adversely reflecting on his fitness to practice law; and Disciplinary Rule 3-101(B) for practicing law in violation of regulations of the profession in Florida.
The referee recommended that respondent receive a public reprimand and that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for ten days with automatic reinstatement.* In addition, the referee recommended that the costs of the proceedings be charged to respondent. We approve the referee’s findings and recommended discipline. Accordingly, respondent shall receive a public reprimand and a ten-day suspension, effective thirty days from the date of this opinion, giving him time to protect any clients. Respondent shall be automatically reinstated after the ten days. The publishing of this opinion in Southern Reporter will constitute the public reprimand.
The costs of these proceedings in the amount of $905.17 are assessed against the respondent.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. *
The referee specifically noted in his findings of fact that the respondent had no prior disciplinary record. Subsequent to the issuance of the referee's report, this Court found respondent guilty of incompetence in the handling of a criminal case. The Florida Bar v. Hawkins, 444 So. 2d 961 (Fla.1984). Respondent received a public reprimand and a two-year period of probation for that offense. This prior disciplinary proceeding does not influence our decision in this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
THE Florida BAR v. Hawkins, 467 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 1985)…awkins, 444 So. 2d 961 (Fla.1984). In 1984, he also received a public reprimand and was suspended for ten days for practicing law while suspended for nonpayment of dues and engaging in conduct involving misrepresentation. The Florida Bar v. Hawkins, 450 So. 2d 483 (Fla.1984). Pending disciplinary proceedings against him include Supreme Court Case No. 65,410 presently before this Court on report of the referee recommending a sixty-day suspension for incompetently handling a legal matter, for neglect, and for e…
Authorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. Hawkins, 444 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 1984)