ALASKA NORTHWEST PUBLISHING CO., AN ALASKA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
A. T. PUBLISHING CO. AND FRANK MARTONE, APPELLEES

9th Cir. | 1972-02-29
No. 71-1618
458 F.2d 387 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Summary judgment was improperly granted for defendants because genuine issues of material fact existed regarding trademark infringement and unfair competition claims.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff sued defendants for trademark infringement and unfair competition due to similar magazine names. Defendants moved to dismiss, and plaintiff …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Alaska Northwest Publishing Co. brought this action against A. T. Publishing Co. and Frank Martone to recover damages and obtain injunctive relief for trademark infringement and unfair competition. The litigation involves the similarity of names of plaintiff’s and defendants’ respective magazines. Defendants moved to dismiss the action for failure of the amended complaint to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and for other reasons. Plaintiff responded with a motion for summary judgment.

After argument on these motions and the allowance of additional time for the filing of documents, the district court entered an order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and purporting to grant defendants’ motion to dismiss, 319 F.Supp. 963. But since matters outside the pleading were presented to and not excluded by the court, the order must be treated as one granting summary judgment for defendants. The fact that defendants did not file a cross motion for summary judgment is immaterial where, as here, all parties had notice of the issues. See IHC, Inc. v. Affiliated FM Insurance Company, 451 F. 2d 758, note 1 (10th Cir. 1971).

A motion for summary judgment may not be granted where there is a genuine issue as to a material fact. See Rule 56(c), F.R.Civ.P. Plaintiff argues, in effect, that here there were genuine issues as to material facts on both the trademark infringement and unfair competition claims. We agree. Accordingly, the order dismissing the action is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw