PATRICK H. O'SHAUGHNESSY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM MCCREADY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

6th Cir. | 1972-05-25
No. 71-1968
458 F.2d 1359 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1972)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1360] PER CURIAM.

In this case appellant contends that the District Judge dismissed his complaint which sounds in both diversity and civil rights on the grounds of immunity, when in fact, some, if not all of the defendants, are not immune.

Noting, however, that the Judge had before him a motion to dismiss on grounds of the various statutes of limitations which would be applicable to the causes of action sought to be presented herein, and that on the conceded facts all of the actions are plainly barred, the appeal is hereby dismissed under Rules 8 and 9 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. See Minchella v. Estate of Skillman, 356 F. 2d 52 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 385 U.S. 861, 87 S.Ct. 114, 17 L.Ed.2d 87 (1966).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw