UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
SAMUEL LESTER HOLLIFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
SAMUEL LESTER HOLLIFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
458 F.2d 1362
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Intelligent Waiver cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Hollifield was convicted for having threatened the life of the President of the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 871.
His contention that the prosecution’s evidence was insufficient must be rejected upon the authority of Roy v. United States, 416 F. 2d 874 (9th Cir. 1969) and United States v. Melendy, 438 F. 2d 531 (9th Cir. 1971). See also United States v. Hart, 457 F. 2d 1087 (10th Cir. 1972).
Hollifield’s other contention, that he did not enter an intelligent waiver of a jury trial, has no merit whatsoever. He made his waiver in writing, and he, at the time, was represented by an attorney.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Nusz, 462 F.2d 617 (9th Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- ROY v. United States, 416 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1969)
- United States v. Hart, 457 F.2d 1087 (10th Cir. 1972)
- United States v. Dozois, 438 F.2d 531 (9th Cir. 1971)